Judy McKnight's Napolog
Web log of Napo's general secretary
April 01, 2008
April Fool?
Today is the operative date for the payment of increments and for the pay increase which should ensure that as a minimum pay keeps up with inflation.
Probation Employers will not however pay increments at this stage and have as yet made no offer in response to our pay claim.
Napo's NEC decided at its March meeting that we should conduct an indicative ballot of Probation members to see if there is support for industrial action should it be necessary this year.
We are pleased that Unison has also agreed to this action, and we have agreed a Joint Statement on the indicative ballot which will be held in May.
Please see below a copy of the Action on Pay Bulletin No 3 issued today which also contains the Joint Statement with Unison.
Action on Pay
Bulletin No 3
April Fool?
Today, 1st April, is the operative date for Probation members to receive their increments and the pay rise they are entitled to expect; a pay rise which should, as a minimum, ensure pay remains in line with the rate of inflation.
This year our Employers are refusing to pay increments from 1st April and to date no offer has been received on the pay increase due despite the Trade Unions’ claim having been lodged on 15th January.
The Employers are insisting that this year the rate of incremental progression is included in the annual pay negotiations. Although no pay offer has yet been received we know that the Treasury is insisting that public sector pay settlements are consistent with a target of 2% inflation, even though the retail price index is currently increasing by over 4% per annum.
Although we always knew that negotiations would be difficult this year as a result of the Treasury policy on public sector pay, we were unprepared for our own Employers taking such a draconian approach to their own staff. In responding to our pay claim the Employers have also indicated that that they are looking to attack other conditions of service such as sick pay and are threatening to introduce performance related pay.
As in previous years, we would seek if at all possible, to negotiate a good outcome for members without recourse to industrial action. We sense that this year it may however be necessary to be ready to consider industrial action, which may need to include strike action as well as action short of a strike, such as working to contracted hours.
Indicative Ballot for Industrial Action
Napo’s March NEC meeting agreed that we should in the first instance conduct an indicative ballot to see if members will support a campaign of industrial action. A move to a statutory ballot will follow if the indicative ballot shows support for action and if progress cannot be made by negotiations alone.
We have now agreed a common approach in respect of the indicative ballot with Unison as it would clearly be important to act together to ensure that any action taken has maximum impact.
As the joint Napo/Unison statement on page 2 sets out, we have agreed to run the indicative ballot during the month of May and we are asking Napo and Unison Branches at a local level to establish joint committees to organise local campaigning action.
In entering this year’s pay negotiations, as your negotiators we need to know if members are prepared to back us with industrial action, should it prove necessary.
More detail will follow on the next steps in this year’s pay campaign.
Judy McKnight
General Secretary
1st April 2008
4 Chivalry Road, London SW11 1HT
Telephone 020 7223 4887
Fax 020 7223 3503
N19-08
www.napo.org.uk
Probation Pay Dispute - Joint Napo/Unison Statement
At the meeting of the National Negotiating Council (NNC) on the 4th March Napo and Unison jointly registered a dispute following the Employers’ confirmation of their decision to withhold the payment of increments to staff on the 1st April 2008.
Whilst the Employers accept that staff have a contractual right to incremental progression they are insisting that the rate of progression is agreed as part of the negotiations on the trade union pay claim for 2008/09. The unions have made clear that this is unacceptable:
there is no written agreement suggesting increments should not be paid as laid out in he 3 year pay deal ending on the 31st March;
it is unjust and potentially discriminatory;
it will mean staff face a pay cut as a result of the increase in pension contributions from the st April.
Negotiations with the Employers are continuing in the hope of resolving this dispute (as well as addressing the formal pay claim) but the unions believe we must consider other options in pursuit of justice for our members in the Probation Service.
Next Steps
Napo and Unison have met nationally and agreed the next steps in our dispute. We have agreed to hold an indicative ballot of members to establish support for our dispute and commitment to any action that might become necessary if negotiations are unsuccessful. However, it should be noted that industrial action can only be taken following a statutory ballot of all members.
Branch Action
Napo/Unison Branches are to establish joint committees immediately which will organise and implement local campaigning and disseminate information related to the dispute.
The indicative ballot will start on 1st May – the joint committees will be asked to organise workplace meetings on that day which will promote the ballot and focus on the reasons for the dispute.
The indicative ballot process and format will be confirmed shortly and Napo and Unison members will receive a ballot paper with identical wording.
The ballot will close on the 30th May.
Further information will be provided to Branches and the joint committees in due course. Branches are asked to provide their respective National Officials with the contact details of their joint committees as soon as the information is available.
Any questions regarding this Circular should be directed to Jonathan Ledger, Assistant General Secretary, for Napo Branches or Ben Priestley, National Officer, for Unison Branches.
Judy McKnight Ben Priestley
Napo Unison
Posted by jmcknight at April 1, 2008 04:42 PM
Comments
Archive
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
Log-in
