« September 2008 | Main | November 2008 »
October 29, 2008
TRAVEL ALLOWANCES AND CAR PARKING.
Recently received, these are the probation board’s proposals on changes to travel allowances. They have not emerged through negotiations with the unions.
There are two meetings between HPA and the unions scheduled for November – these meetings have been billed as ‘consultations’.
We advise all members of Napo to read and consider these proposals and relay your thoughts as soon as possible to Napo representatives – you can email Tina Williams, Richard Marshall, or George Clarke with your views.
These proposals, if implemented, will negatively impact financially on the overwhelming majority of Napo and Unison members, irrespective of whether you are an essential or casual user and irrespective of whether you use your car for any business purpose because of the changes proposed in relation to parking in a HPA car park.
We need to know your views.
At the next branch meeting on Friday 21 November at the Portsmouth Probation office there will be discussion about these proposals and there is likely to be a motion for debate. We urge as many members as possible to attend.
Posted by Hampshire at 05:45 PM | Comments (0)
October 27, 2008
CRIMINOGENIC NEEDS OF OFENDERS - PASSE
"When I hear phrases like 'criminogenic needs of offenders' it drives me nuts, for two reasons. First, it is pretty impenetrable jargon designed to put a barrier between the practitioner and public. And second, because I profoundly disagree that we should describe someone's amoral desire to go thieving as a 'need' equivalent to that of victims or the law-abiding public."
This is from a speech by Jack Straw (27/10/08) which was trailed as an attack on criminal justice reform groups. What, of course, is ironical is that the offending 'impenetrable jargon' has nothing to do with reformist movements, but was very much a product of the beloved OASys which was very much a product of government and home office thinking and a phrase frequently cited in court reports. Looks like it's now out of fashion and it's all the fault of criminal justice reformers. Looks like the probation script is being rewritten...
Jack Straw also said: "No one in the system should hide behind jargon".
"For a man to attack jargon while boasting in the same speech of "multi agency public protection agreements" and "integrated offender management" is absurd."
http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/sp271008a.htm
STRAW MAN:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/oct/28/jack-straw-prisons-crime
Posted by Hampshire at 06:40 PM | Comments (0)
October 26, 2008
EDRIDGE FUND
EDRIDGE FUND: The Edridge Fund exists to provide money, support and help to Probation and CAFCASS people who may be in need.
Apply for Assistance
"Many Probation and Cafcass staff spend their working lives dealing with other people's problems but do not always know where to turn when things get difficult for themselves. The Edridge Fund is here to provide money, support and help if you need it. This could mean cash to cope with an immediate crisis, and for support and advice from one of our Representatives.
The Edridge Fund may be able to help you. Application is swift and confidential, and involves completion of just one form. To apply simply print out the application form, fill it in and either post it to us or send the completed file in an email.
We are allowed to help if your job makes you eligible to join the National Association of Probation Officers (Napo), even if you are not a member. We can also help if you are retired and Edridge can help families and dependents if the eligible person dies. Edridge gives help to people like you who need it, so don't be afraid to ask.
Eligible parties include:
All employees of the Service who are eligible to be members of Napo
Retired Staff
Bereaved Partners, Spouses and Dependents of the above
Edridge operates only on the basis of demonstrated need. Applications are assessed individually and grants are designed to help towards the applicant's specific requirements."
APPLY NOW:
Click here to download the Application Form
Edridge Rep: Gerry Kennelly
Posted by Hampshire at 02:41 PM | Comments (0)
WORKPLACE BALLOTS ON PAY OFFER
This year's pay negotiations were vitriolic. As Napo's general secretary said, in relation to the negotiations, at the recent AGM:
"These problems, of course, were founded on the shameful withholding of increments from staff by the employers. As I have said in my foreword to the annual report, the fact that you can do something does not mean it is right to do it and the employers’ behaviour was neither right nor honourable.
Over the next two weeks we will hold workplace ballots on the pay offer, which must be completed by noon on Friday 7th November. Voting must be in person.
The documents attached explain the pay offer.
The pay deal is for two years.
Increments normally paid in the April of each year will in future be paid in October. You will be compensated for this changeover. Increments will continue to be paid automatically for the next two years at least. They will not be linked to performance. Whether they will ever be linked to performance is a matter for future negotiations. The employers tried it on this time and they will try again to bring in divisive measures - likely to drive pay downwards.
One increment represents 1% of your annual pay. Your pay can increase by 3, 2 or 1 increment, depending on what pay point you are on in relation to the ‘developmental point’ The vast majority of members will be below the developmental point, so you are likely to receive a rise of three increments (3%) in addition to your 2% cost of living increase. You will also receive payments backdated to last April.
As a rough ready reckoner your annual pay will rise by 5%. To apply this to your own pay, divide your annual salary by 20. No member will receive less than a £900 increase.
Valorise means ‘raise’ and Re means ‘once again’. So Revalorisation simply means revised or increased pay scales.
FORMULA: (Assuming below Development Point)
Calculate 1.5% of you salary - that's the lump sum
Add 2% to your salary - that's what you should have been paid since April. The back pay on that will be 1% of your annual salary until the end of September 2008.
Move yourself three incremental points up the scale - and that's your new salary.
If your 2% + 3 incremental points work out less than £900, you get a lump sum to make it up to £900.
Posted by Hampshire at 10:22 AM | Comments (0)
October 21, 2008
NAPO AGM: THE GENERAL SECRETARY'S SPEECH
2008 AGM Speech
Chair, Conference,
I am very proud today to be able to stand before you and present this year’s Annual Report. It’s been quite a year for Napo and, I admit, quite a year for me personally. The process for electing a General Secretary in Napo rivalled the ongoing US presidential campaign in terms of its length and complexity! But I feel privileged to have been elected General Secretary, privileged because Napo means so much to me personally and has been an integral part of my life for more than 20 years. I pledge to serve you to the very best of my ability and to work with you to make Napo even stronger in the years ahead.
I would like to say one final word about my predecessor. I say final because I seem to have spent much of the last few months paying tribute to Judy! Her magnificent service to Napo has been well documented, of course, so my final word is a personal one. Judy has been an inspiration, generous, kind, good humoured, and deeply caring. I can honestly say that I would not be standing here today without her.
The last time I gave a formal address in Llandudno was back in 2001 when I was Napo’s Chair. On that occasion, as some of you may recall, I gave the first part of my speech in Welsh. I was very anxious about that and was reliant on the assistance of one of Napo’s former Administrators, Gaenor Kyffin, who is a Welsh speaker. In fact, I had a Dictaphone recording of Gaenor reciting the two sentences I had to say and immediately before giving my speech I was hiding behind the curtain listening to it repeatedly! Anyway, it appeared to go ok. At the end of the speech I was approached by a North Wales Branch member who thanked me for my efforts but gave me a slight reprimand - it was a pity, he said, you spoke with a South Wales accent!
Back to 2008 and we appear to be living in interesting times. I believe that adage comes from a Chinese curse, a curse because ‘interesting’ means life is unpredictable, uncertain, and volatile. Well it certainly feels like the world has been turned upside down recently as the global money markets have gone into meltdown - just a couple of days ago I heard a report on the radio suggesting that whilst Britain, along with the rest of Europe and the USA, is nationalising many of its banks, China is considering privatising its banking sector!
As we are all aware the chaos in the money markets and, most significantly, the Government’s investment of billions of pounds of public money into saving banks, is going to impact on all the economy, in the public sector, and on us individually. Given that the public sector was already under the threat of cuts across education, health, local government and the justice system, trade unions collectively are increasingly concerned about the future for members.
Public Sector unions meet regularly at the TUC in the Public Sector Liaison Group, predominantly at General Secretary level, where much of the discussion focuses on budgets, resources and pay and conditions issues. At its most recent meeting it was noticeable that, in looking ahead to 2009, unions are beginning to identify job protection as the priority for negotiations.
We have already had some experience of this threat during last winter when in response to a 5% cut in the probation budget many areas began to issue compulsory redundancy notices. It was a tough time for those branches and members affected. Although the threat was reduced by the return of £40million to the budget – why is it, incidentally, that so many lay claim to that “achievement” but no one ever owns up individually to making cuts? – recent events suggest that this threat may return more strongly in the coming months. The Times’ disclosure this week of a leaked MoJ document setting out proposals for up to 4000 job cuts in NOMS, 1300 of them in the Probation Service, may or may not prove accurate. But let me say this. It may be the job of politicians and civil servants to ‘think the unthinkable’ but it is the job of trade unions to stop the implementation of the unthinkable, unacceptable, and downright dangerous and stupid. And let’s be clear, this is exactly what cuts in probation jobs would be - Napo will fight such a move with all the resources at our disposal.
But we are not alone in this fight. Napo has joined forces with other unions several times in this past year promoting the work, values and conditions of public sector workers. As always, Napo members have demonstrated their unfailing commitment to the movement by lobbying MPs, attending rallies and meetings organised nationally and locally amongst many other activities. I thank you and congratulate you . And I also want to thank Harry for his skill and dedication in promoting Napo, and the issues that we care about, in the media and his ceaseless campaigning zeal. This has been quite a year for Harry too, and not always an easy one, and I am proud to work alongside such a committed and courageous colleague and friend.
And now, of course, we are looking forward to Justice Week and I am confident that members will, once again, engage with all the activities taking place. This is a tremendous opportunity for us to promote the values we care about alongside our sisters and brothers in PCS, Unison, POA and other unions. It is also striking that the Police Federation has signed up. Taking a break from an NNC meeting with the employers last December, the Napo and Unison delegations stood in Victoria showing support for the silent ranks of police in white caps marching through London. All is not well in our justice system but there is a power and strength to be gained from acting collectively.
Justice Week is timely given the continued lurching of NOMS from one reorganisation to another. In the latest change the unloved ROMS have been removed only to be replaced by DOMS who, I am told, will be more senior than ROMS were (ie paid more) and have a yet to be explained management responsibility for the prison governors and chief officers in their areas. And, apparently, these changes are going to save money! It’s a bit too early to comment on the effectiveness of the new DOMS but it is hardly surprising that we are more than a little sceptical. We always asked for an explanation of the role and purpose of ROMS but never got it – what we did get was the consequences of wasting an enormous amount of public money on a useless tier of bureaucracy, money that should have been spent on the front line practitioners and managers changing lives and protecting their communities. You will be familiar with the First World War phrase about lions led by donkeys. Well, given the history of NOMS a few donkeys in control might be something of an improvement! And think of the money we would save. The donkeys, or DONS as they would be known I guess, wouldn’t need much more than some straw, a few carrots and oats, and the occasional stroll around the local park. I can almost sense a consultant somewhere sucking thoughtfully on a pen top!
And where, in all these changes, is the Probation Service? Since NOMS’ inception Napo has fought hard to defend the Service we all care about so deeply. We appear to have fought off the dreaded ‘C’ word, that ugly concept ‘contestability’ though, like any malevolent virus, we should not underestimate its potential to re-construct itself especially with the growing threat of recession and swingeing cuts in public sector resources - specifically an unfeasible cut of £277 million in the Probation Service budget in the next two financial years. But the recent announcement that the Director of Probation post, soon to be vacated by Roger Hill who is to become a DOM (enough said, I think), will cease to exist in April is a worrying development. I have written to the NOMS Minister and spoken to him about our concerns. These are not just about the Director’s post itself but about the general absence of probation representatives at the most senior level in NOMS. It has been a prison takeover and we will continue to point this out at all levels of NOMS until action is taken. I think we have support from other organisations but I believe it is time for the Probation Association and the newly formed Probation Chiefs’ Association to start going public with their views. The ‘softly, softly’ approach is in danger of being ignored.
The absurdity of the situation is highlighted by the appointment of a former prison governor to lead on the development of the new qualifying and training arrangements for Probation. Having said that, the re-instatement of this vital project, following several months of delay and uncertainty, is one piece of welcome news. Congratulations to Cordell for her perseverance in keeping this project on track - she will provide a vital presence for Napo as its work is developed.
Ostensibly, the situation in CAFCASS appears much better given the allocation of a 3 year budget providing an average annual increase of some 7%. However, this past year has been clouded by the arrival of OFSTED as the new inspector of the organisation. It has seemed intent on making its mark by serving up a series of highly critical reports of several CAFCASS regions but in the process demonstrated frequent misunderstanding of the roles performed by staff. What was needed was a steady, calm, and measured response from the top of the organisation. What we got was, at times, not much short of a Corporal Jones’ strategy for inducing panic! This is not to underestimate the importance of the inspections or their implications for CAFCASS but, all too often, staff of all grades appear to have been forgotten as hurried plans and policies have been introduced. As is so often the case in any organisation, CAFCASS would have benefited by listening more and implementing less.
I would like to commend to members the recently issued ‘CAFCASS at risk’ briefing from Napo to parliamentarians. It provides an excellent overview of practice development in CAFCASS and highlights some of our proposals for improving practice in the organisation. This includes the way staff can be positively developed and supported.
Turning to pay I will stay with Cafcass which is currently, as a Section, considering the Strategic Pay Review which follows months and months of negotiations. There is a lot of money on offer primarily via the new, very short pay band so it is understandable that members have been concerned about the basis of progression. Cafcass, which really is on to a winner here, did its best to grab defeat from the jaws of victory by allowing the propagation of a rumour that PRP is being introduced. That is not true, of course, but it has taken much time and effort to set the record straight. We negotiate with good and decent people in Cafcass. My none too coded message is that those with authority in the organisation must stop interfering with the work of their representatives. Pay talks are not about personal glory, they are a serious and difficult responsibility on which lies the well being of thousands of staff.
Whilst the SPR in Cafcass contains the sort of offer unlikely to be available in the public sector for the foreseeable future, the situation is different in the Probation Service. I am struggling to remember a more difficult and, at times, more vitriolic pay round. These problems, of course, were founded on the shameful withholding of increments from staff by the employers. As I have said in my foreword to the annual report, the fact that you can do something does not mean it is right to do it and the employers’ behaviour was neither right nor honourable.
This year’s Bill McWilliams Memorial Lecture was given by Judy back in June. Traditionally, someone is invited to respond at the end of the lecture and this year that responsibility was given to Alan Wooderson, Chair of the Probation Association. In his remarks he commented on the efforts of the national employers to re-position themselves with the Government expressing the view that they were, to quote his own phrase, in ‘bad odour’ with Ministers. Well, Alan, I have to tell you that the employers’ decision to withhold increments from staff has created a stink that will linger long in the memory of Napo members – the employers have a lot of work to do rebuilding trust and credibility.
I know that this year’s offer is not going to have members hanging out the bunting and celebrating. However, in the context in which we were negotiating, and the worsening economic climate, I am pleased we have obtained a two year offer which delivers on our key principle of securing the progression arrangements put in place in 2006. I will not deny to you that pay progression in the longer term is likely to be a major battleground but this offer provides time for those key negotiations to take place. And, once again, I want to congratulate members for the magnificent turnout and vote in favour of action in the indicative ballot. This was undoubtedly the turning point in the negotiations. It changed the attitude of the employers and strengthened our negotiating hand, providing inspiration to the negotiators. We may not need industrial action over pay this year, but members showed that, if it was necessary, they would deliver. For me, that was Napo at its very best.
And keeping Napo at its very best, building and strengthening the union, is what we all want for the future. Which is why this year’s Strategic Review has been so important. None of us are likely to argue with its key tenets, that we should be focusing more on recruitment, that we should be more inclusive empowering all members and ensuring we are representative of all our members (and on this point I welcome the Protocol developed between Napo and the staff associations, a vital development given the apparent weakening of NOMS’ commitment to diversity), and that we should be improving our organisation and support of Branches. The challenge is to deliver the changes necessary to meet these aspirations which means, in some cases, reforming some of our most important and cherished structures. No union can compare with Napo, I believe, in our level of lay member engagement but the AGM, the jewel in our crown, can no longer be based on the diminishing hope that sufficient members will voluntarily attend.
Some of the proposals arising from the Review have already been implemented. Later today ‘Making an Impact’, part of Napo’s new recruitment strategy, will be launched and next month we will be holding a ‘recruitment week’. My thanks to staff, officers and members who have worked hard to deliver this key initiative. All of us must get involved in the active recruitment of members, we cannot afford, in every sense of the term, to assume new members will simply join us. As ‘Making an Impact’ makes clear we have a lot to shout about so let’s ensure everyone hears.
I am also delighted to welcome Ranjit and Mike as they take up their appointment as National Officials on Monday. Over the next few months they will be developing their roles and establishing close ties with Branches and the CAFCASS Section. We wish them well.
Ranjit, of course, is known to us as the Project Manager for Union Learning in England. Along with Aziz, covering the same role in Wales, they have taken lifelong learning into the heart of the union. And, as has often been pointed out to me, this is a valuable recruiting tool.
At the beginning of my speech I suggest that it had been quite a year for Napo. In part, that reflects the extensive change that has taken place at Chivalry Road. As you are aware Pete Bowyer took early retirement in April after nearly 30 years of service to Napo. His knowledge and wisdom is hard to replace and all of us will be grateful to him for all that he has done. I would also like to welcome Ian as our new AGS. He has already made a positive impression on all of us who have worked with him and Napo is all the stronger for his arrival.
Conference, I have another departure I have to announce. As of this week Jenetta Haley retired from her position as the Administrator working with the General Secretary. She has fulfilled that role for more than 10 years and I know that Judy was always profoundly grateful to have Jenetta working alongside her. Jenetta’s dedication, intelligence, sharp wit, and extensive knowledge will be sorely missed. Sadly, Jenetta has been poorly and unable to work for the past few months. In thanking her for all that she has done, we can assure her that she remains in our thoughts and in our hearts.
You may have noticed that all Napo’s staff are attending Conference this year. This gives me the chance to put on record out thanks for the tremendous service they provide, no matter how trying the circumstances. We are fortunate to have them and I hope that you will take any opportunity you have this weekend to pass on your individual thanks. We should also be grateful to the Officers who balance the demands of their position so ably and have steered Napo recently through some very choppy waters.
Conference, I spoke of ‘interesting’ times when opening this address. It is clear that there are some tough challenges ahead for our union and, more than likely, some difficult decisions to be made. But I stand here today with pride because I believe in Napo, in its strength, durability and vitality. It is no accident that we are the leading voice in Probation and Cafcass – it is based on years of knowledge and commitment. And it is based, fundamentally, on all of you; on your care for and dedication to your work and your trade union. So let us go forward with confidence, firm in our values, committed to our beliefs, and united in true solidarity.
Posted by Hampshire at 06:50 PM | Comments (0)
October 14, 2008
TRAVEL ALLOWANCES AND PARKING
We had a meeting on October 14th with the chief officer and the director of HR. it was an initial consultation to look at some draft options. We have been promised a paper from HPA within the next two weeks setting out their position and as soon as we get it we will seek to obtain responses from members. We are not in a position at this stage to go into detail, but it's fair to say the issue of travel allowances and parking is likely to impinge on all members and we aim to consult as much as we can so we are absolutely clear about the mandate for negotiations.
Posted by Hampshire at 08:02 PM | Comments (0)
PROBATION PAY OFFER
Dear Colleague,
Probation Pay Offer 2008-2010
I am writing to provide you with the formal offer from the employers in response to the trade union side claim originally tabled in January 2008. The offer constitutes a 2 year deal covering the period 1/4/08 - 31/3/10. Please draw this Circular to the attention of all members.
The Probation Negotiating Committee is recommending acceptance of this offer to members. Unison is also recommending acceptance. The offer in full is attached.
Background
At the time that the trade union side made its claim it was becoming clear that the employers had decided to withhold the payment of increments and include the payments as part of the overall resolution of the pay round. Whilst the employers have always accepted their contractual obligation to pay increments the number of points awarded are, they believe, open to negotiation. It was this issue which dominated the negotiations more than any other with the trade union side recording a dispute and running an indicative ballot which demonstrated overwhelming support for industrial action if necessary from 92% of those voting in a turnout of over 50%.
It was this stunning response from members in the ballot which we believe had the effect of forcing the employers to reconsider the unhelpful stance they had maintained in negotiations until that time. Subsequently more meaningful negotiations were initiated and slow progress was achieved. The issue of the rightful payment of the increments due to staff remained, however, a priority for the trade union side and was the principal stumbling block during the summer. The negotiators are pleased, therefore, that this offer includes the payment of the increments due to staff for the 2 years of the deal on the basis established in the 3 year Pay Modernisation Agreement of 3, 2 or 1 point on the salary bands.
The Treasury's constraining position on public sector pay was a further difficulty which the deteriorating global and national financial situation has only served to exacerbate. The increases in headline pay have to be seen in this context bearing in mind that the initial proposal involved an increase of less than 2%. The economic outlook is also the reason why the negotiators feel that a 2 year agreement is in the best interest of members at this time.
The Offer
i) Headline pay
This will be increased by 2% from the 1/4/08 and increased by a further 2.3% on the 1/4/09. The increase for the current year will be backdated and paid to members once agreement has been reached on the offer. The economic factors impacting on the size of this increase are set out above.
ii) London Allowance
The allowance will be increased by £100 in the two years of the deal with this year's money being backdated. The original offer simply passed on the headline pay % above to the allowance for the 2 years. We were successful in having the figures rounded up and whilst these increases are short of our aspirations they mark an increase of almost 5.5% over the course of the deal.
iii) Pay progression
Pay progression will take place during the two years of the deal in line with the arrangements put in place under the Pay and Modernisation Agreement covering the period 2005-08 ie 3, 2 or 1 point according to the individual's position on the pay band in relation to the development point.
It is proposed, however, to move the date of incremental progression to the 1st October. This is designed to separate the appraisal and personal development period running from April to April from the date at which progression is applied. This will complement the arrangements for the implementation of the development point (provided for in the 05-08 agreement) once they are agreed by the NNC. Staff will be compensated for the change in the date in the first year of the deal by a one off unconsolidated payment providing a sum equivalent to that which would have been paid if progression had taken place on the 1st April.
It is the case that longer term progression beyond the period of this offer will be the subject of future negotiations. Negotiators will be seeking to maintain the current arrangements or, indeed, improve them but are aware that the employers have their own agenda. The two year deal does offer all parties the space in which to seek agreement ahead of the 1st October 2010 in order to avoid the confusion and anger caused by the employers' actions this year.
iv) Minimum payment
In both years of the deal any member of staff whose pay is increased by less than £900 will receive an unconsolidated sum to take their increase to £900. The attached offer carries examples of how this will apply. This provision is particularly welcome for lower paid staff and for some staff above the development pay receiving the lower rate of progression.
v) Band shortening
On the 1st October 2008 and 2009 Bands 1-4 will have the existing lowest point removed raising the starting salary in those bands. From a trade union perspective this is welcome but is part of an ongoing piece of work aimed at shortening some of the existing bands further in line with equality principles.
Probation Modernisation
The offer includes a joint commitment by all parties to discussions of an agreed agenda of items currently unresolved. This covers, amongst other things, pay progression beyond the period of the two year deal, the pay structure including equality issues, and the harmonisation of working hours all of which formed part of the trade union side claim. A work programme will be agreed by the 31st March 2009 although no guarantee can be provided that agreement will be achieved on every issue. The paper covering this outstanding work is being agreed separately and will be circulated to branches in due course.
Conclusion
Napo members in Probation have been treated poorly this year and the employers are aware of the loss of trust their behaviour has engendered. The collective response of membership, notably in the indicative ballot, has demonstrated the strength of members’ feelings and their willingness to fight for their rights if it became necessary.
As stated above the Probation Negotiating Committee is recommending members' acceptance of this offer. It is not simply the Committee's view that this is the best offer that can be negotiated at this time; it is also its opinion that, under the current circumstances, the offer is a positive outcome following months of difficult negotiations.
Branches are asked to organise meetings at which members can discuss and vote on the offer. In line with the national constitution (clause 20 (a), subsection (vi) these meetings do not have to be quorate. A separate ratification document will follow. The deadline for results to be received by the General Secretary is 12 noon on Monday 10th November 2008.
Yours sincerely,
JONATHAN LEDGER
General Secretary
Posted by Hampshire at 07:57 PM | Comments (0)
October 04, 2008
PSO FORUM
PSO Forum: Wednesday 5th November 2008, The Park Plaza Hotel, Leeds
11.00 am – 4.00 pm. Please contact Tina Williams if you are interested in attending this forum.
Posted by Hampshire at 07:44 PM | Comments (0)
PAY UPDATE
The NNC met on the 29th September. The unions had hoped for a formal offer to be forthcoming but immediate hopes were dashed as a result of further Treasury discussions. However, this is only a temporary delay and talks resume next week.
We have given the employers and MoJ a final extension on the basis that, overall, we have made positive progress - this includes the vital issue of increments in the immediate future. Bearing in mind that Napo's AGM begins on the 17th October we are expecting to be able to go public with an offer ahead of Conference. Even the Treasury, apparently, is sensitive to this timescale! I am also due to meet with the Probation Minister ahead of AGM to press our case if necessary.
Download file for further information
Posted by Hampshire at 07:40 PM | Comments (0)